Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Lakeside Bank vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Lakeside Bank | Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 75 | 100 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 92 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 26 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 77th | 100th |
| Total assets | $2.9B | $2.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.5B | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.99% | 15.53% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.03% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.81% | 3.21% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.4% | 35.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 51.7% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.2% | — |
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lakeside Bank leads on 1 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.