Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Lakeside Bank vs One World Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Lakeside Bank | One World Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 94 (stronger) | 82 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 87 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 73 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 34th |
| Total assets | $389.2M | $290.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $311.6M | $245.0M |
| Capital ratio | 14.37% (stronger) | 13.24% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 4.75% |
| Return on assets | 1.67% (stronger) | -1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 83.4% (stronger) | 90.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.1% (stronger) | 32.5% |
| Offices | 2 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Lakeside Bank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 67). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lakeside Bank leads on 6 and One World Bank on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.