Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Latvian Credit Union vs Arise Community Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Latvian Credit Union | Arise Community Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 72 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 35 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 71 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 24th | 65th |
| Total assets | $5.8M | $908K |
| Deposits / shares | $5.2M | $174K |
| Capital ratio | 11.01% | 80.36% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.85% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.38% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.37% (stronger) | -61.33% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.1% | 9.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.4% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 0 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Arise Community Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Credit Union leads on 1 and Arise Community Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.