TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Latvian Federal Credit Union vs Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Greenwich, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLatvian Federal Credit UnionGreenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8889 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)95
Loan quality100 (stronger)71
Earnings4290 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)97
Peer percentile85th87th
Total assets$1.8M$32.6M
Deposits / shares$1.4M$27.7M
Capital ratio25.25% (stronger)14.53%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.87%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets0.55%1.75% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits20.4% (stronger)33.0%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)5.4%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 88). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Greenwich Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions