TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union vs Htm Credit Union

Credit union

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union

Leominster, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Htm Credit Union

Haverhill, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLeominster Employees Federal Credit UnionHtm Credit Union
TellerScore8084 (stronger)
Capital cushion6288 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)96
Earnings56 (stronger)47
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)97
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)99
Peer percentile65th75th
Total assets$30.0M$29.6M
Deposits / shares$26.4M$25.6M
Capital ratio11.20%13.79% (stronger)
Problem loans0.01% (stronger)0.11%
Net charge-offs-0.01% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.90% (stronger)0.67%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)63.1%
Uninsured deposits0.3% (stronger)3.4%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Htm Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Htm Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions