TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Library of Congress Federal Credit Union vs Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Library of Congress Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLibrary of Congress Federal Credit UnionMt Gilead Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8493 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality82100 (stronger)
Earnings5366 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity92100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94100 (stronger)
Peer percentile86th94th
Total assets$338.2M$78K
Deposits / shares$278.8M$63K
Capital ratio16.65%17.49% (stronger)
Problem loans0.53%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.34%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.82%1.14% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits68.1%35.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits14.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 84). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Library of Congress Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions