TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Local 697 Federal Credit Union vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Local 697 Federal Credit Union

Merrillville, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets

58of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLocal 697 Federal Credit UnionIsrael Methcomm Federal Credit Union
TellerScore58100 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality0100 (stronger)
Earnings26100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage73100 (stronger)
Peer percentile19th100th
Total assets$49.0M$2.0M
Deposits / shares$41.4M$1.4M
Capital ratio16.03% (stronger)15.53%
Problem loans4.55%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.10% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.14%3.21% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits55.8%35.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits10.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Local 697 Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions