TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Local Union 392 Federal Credit Union vs Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union

Credit union

Local Union 392 Federal Credit Union

Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

75of 100
Strong

Credit union

Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union

Mansfield, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

69of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureLocal Union 392 Federal Credit UnionGorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union
TellerScore75 (stronger)69
Capital cushion100 (stronger)42
Loan quality3096 (stronger)
Earnings74 (stronger)44
Funding & liquidity95 (stronger)93
Problem-loan coverage8698 (stronger)
Peer percentile52nd38th
Total assets$17.5M$16.7M
Deposits / shares$14.7M$15.1M
Capital ratio15.87% (stronger)9.19%
Problem loans2.09%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.38%0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets1.35% (stronger)0.59%
Loans ÷ deposits65.5% (stronger)66.9%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Local Union 392 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 69). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Local Union 392 Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions