TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Lormet Community Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Credit union

Lormet Community Federal Credit Union

Amherst, Ohio · $100 million – $1 billion

91of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Lakewood, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLormet Community Federal Credit UnionLatvian Cleveland Credit Union
TellerScore91 (stronger)85
Capital cushion87100 (stronger)
Loan quality95100 (stronger)
Earnings80 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)85
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile96th77th
Total assets$283.3M$28.1M
Deposits / shares$244.4M$22.3M
Capital ratio13.73%20.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.15%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.14%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.50% (stronger)0.40%
Loans ÷ deposits56.9% (stronger)74.9%
Uninsured deposits3.2% (stronger)4.0%
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Lormet Community Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lormet Community Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Latvian Cleveland Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions