TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union vs California Adventist Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union

Los Angeles, California · Under $100 million in assets

56of 100
Moderate

Credit union

California Adventist Federal Credit Union

Glendale, California · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLos Angeles Lee Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Adventist Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5689 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality099 (stronger)
Earnings1257 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)84
Problem-loan coverage88100 (stronger)
Peer percentile16th87th
Total assets$644K$44.7M
Deposits / shares$494K$35.5M
Capital ratio23.13% (stronger)20.11%
Problem loans3.26%0.04% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.19%0.92% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits57.1% (stronger)76.0%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)0.8%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

California Adventist Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and California Adventist Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions