TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Luminate Bank vs Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Luminate Bank

Minneapolis, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

47of 100
Below average

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLuminate BankToro Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4784 (stronger)
Capital cushion5495 (stronger)
Loan quality2281 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)73
Funding & liquidity172 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage5694 (stronger)
Peer percentile5th75th
Total assets$554.5M$41.5M
Deposits / shares$412.7M$34.9M
Capital ratio10.40%14.46% (stronger)
Problem loans2.33%0.56% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.53%0.30% (stronger)
Return on assets3.07% (stronger)1.34%
Loans ÷ deposits108.8%88.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits63.3%4.1% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)4.3%—

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 47). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Luminate Bank leads on 1 and Toro Employees Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions