TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Lusitania Savings Bank vs Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Bank

Lusitania Savings Bank

Newark, New Jersey · $100 million – $1 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Jamaica, New York · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLusitania Savings BankPaul Quinn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8693 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality94100 (stronger)
Earnings3965 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity96100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile90th94th
Total assets$418.1M$358K
Deposits / shares$353.5M$251K
Capital ratio14.97%26.10% (stronger)
Problem loans0.19%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets0.48%1.12% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits63.9%19.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)6.3%—

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 86). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lusitania Savings Bank leads on 0 and Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions