Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Lusitania Savings Bank vs Wakefern Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Wakefern Federal Credit Union
Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Lusitania Savings Bank | Wakefern Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 94 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 39 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 99th |
| Total assets | $418.1M | $12.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $353.5M | $9.1M |
| Capital ratio | 14.97% | 24.31% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.19% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.09% |
| Return on assets | 0.48% | 2.03% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.9% | 42.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 7.3% (stronger) | 16.4% |
| Offices | 4 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.3% | — |
Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lusitania Savings Bank leads on 2 and Wakefern Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.