TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mahoning Valley Federal Credit Union vs Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union

Credit union

Mahoning Valley Federal Credit Union

Youngstown, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

50of 100
Below average

Credit union

Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union

Dayton, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureMahoning Valley Federal Credit UnionWright-Dunbar Area Credit Union
TellerScore5054 (stronger)
Capital cushion52100 (stronger)
Loan quality40 (stronger)0
Earnings039 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage89 (stronger)14
Peer percentile9th13th
Total assets$376K$360K
Deposits / shares$337K$290K
Capital ratio10.17%18.47% (stronger)
Problem loans1.80% (stronger)24.93%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets-6.85%0.47% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits40.9% (stronger)42.9%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (54 vs 50). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mahoning Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions