Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Malvern Bank vs Woodmen Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Malvern Bank | Woodmen Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 39 | 90 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 88 | 93 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 18 |
| Funding & liquidity | 53 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 34th | 62nd |
| Total assets | $253.2M | $9.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $217.7M | $7.9M |
| Capital ratio | 8.91% | 14.01% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.37% | 0.20% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.09% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.45% (stronger) | -0.05% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 98.9% | 43.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.1% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Woodmen Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Malvern Bank leads on 1 and Woodmen Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.