TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Massena Savings and Loan vs Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union

Bank

Massena Savings and Loan

Massena, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union

Massena, New York · Under $100 million in assets

83of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMassena Savings and LoanTwin Rivers Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7383 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)81
Loan quality5793 (stronger)
Earnings63 (stronger)53
Funding & liquidity50100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8399 (stronger)
Peer percentile53rd72nd
Total assets$199.9M$39.2M
Deposits / shares$148.2M$35.2M
Capital ratio15.15% (stronger)13.07%
Problem loans1.30%0.22% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.11% (stronger)1.19%
Return on assets1.09% (stronger)0.84%
Loans ÷ deposits121.7%45.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits12.8%3.1% (stronger)
Offices22
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Massena Savings and Loan leads on 3 and Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions