TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union vs Tongass Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union

Palmer, Alaska · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Tongass Federal Credit Union

Ketchikan, Alaska · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMatanuska Valley Federal Credit UnionTongass Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6873 (stronger)
Capital cushion5779 (stronger)
Loan quality6886 (stronger)
Earnings52 (stronger)32
Funding & liquidity96 (stronger)79
Problem-loan coverage8995 (stronger)
Peer percentile45th60th
Total assets$977.3M$251.9M
Deposits / shares$876.0M$213.8M
Capital ratio10.67%12.86% (stronger)
Problem loans0.95%0.43% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.97%0.24% (stronger)
Return on assets0.81% (stronger)0.30%
Loans ÷ deposits64.7% (stronger)81.2%
Uninsured deposits12.1%5.5% (stronger)
Offices85
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)15.1%—

Tongass Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Tongass Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions