TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Maternity B.V.M. Credit Union vs Commonwealth Credit Union

Credit union

Maternity B.V.M. Credit Union

Bourbonnais, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

79of 100
Strong

Credit union

Commonwealth Credit Union

Bourbonnais, Illinois · $100 million – $1 billion

83of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMaternity B.V.M. Credit UnionCommonwealth Credit Union
TellerScore7983 (stronger)
Capital cushion7882 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)86
Earnings3974 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity88 (stronger)85
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)96
Peer percentile62nd83rd
Total assets$11.3M$128.1M
Deposits / shares$9.9M$111.0M
Capital ratio12.78%13.23% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.43%
Net charge-offs0.20% (stronger)0.21%
Return on assets0.49%1.36% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits72.4% (stronger)74.8%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Commonwealth Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 79). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Maternity B.V.M. Credit Union leads on 3 and Commonwealth Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions