Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union vs Landings Credit Union
Credit union
Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union
Rochester, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union | Landings Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 98 (stronger) | 71 |
| Capital cushion | 99 (stronger) | 57 |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 74 |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 57 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 54th |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $263.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $234.3M |
| Capital ratio | 14.90% (stronger) | 10.72% |
| Problem loans | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.79% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Return on assets | 1.80% (stronger) | 0.91% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 55.3% (stronger) | 61.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.2% | 5.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 18.7% | — |
Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 71). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mayo Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Landings Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.