Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union vs Social Security Credit Union
Credit union
Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union
Eufaula, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union | Social Security Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 51 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 41 | 83 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 24th | 75th |
| Total assets | $40.3M | $37.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $31.1M | $28.5M |
| Capital ratio | 22.98% (stronger) | 22.63% |
| Problem loans | 6.71% | 1.47% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.92% | 0.67% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.53% | 1.59% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 31.6% (stronger) | 48.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 1.5% (stronger) | 2.4% |
| Offices | 2 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Social Security Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Social Security Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.