Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Metz Banking Company vs Mid-Missouri Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Metz Banking Company | Mid-Missouri Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 80 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 58 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Earnings | 84 | 85 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 (stronger) | 74 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 88th | 77th |
| Total assets | $117.3M | $946.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $104.0M | $844.3M |
| Capital ratio | 11.60% (stronger) | 10.80% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.07% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.04% |
| Return on assets | 1.60% | 1.63% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.6% (stronger) | 79.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 10.4% (stronger) | 20.7% |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Metz Banking Company has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Metz Banking Company leads on 6 and Mid-Missouri Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.