TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union vs University of Michigan Credit Union

Credit union

Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union

Livonia, Michigan · Under $100 million in assets

82of 100
Strong

Credit union

University of Michigan Credit Union

Ann Arbor, Michigan · $1 billion – $10 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureMichigan Columbus Federal Credit UnionUniversity of Michigan Credit Union
TellerScore82 (stronger)61
Capital cushion100 (stronger)61
Loan quality6673 (stronger)
Earnings52 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)57
Problem-loan coverage96 (stronger)88
Peer percentile70th27th
Total assets$75.0M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$62.4M$1.1B
Capital ratio16.57% (stronger)11.08%
Problem loans1.01%0.82% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.46% (stronger)0.62%
Return on assets0.80% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits42.3% (stronger)103.3%
Uninsured deposits3.9% (stronger)10.6%
Offices26
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%7.1%

Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and University of Michigan Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions