Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mid Penn Bank vs The Bank of Landisburg
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mid Penn Bank | The Bank of Landisburg |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 69 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 83 (stronger) | 46 |
| Earnings | 70 | 89 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 82 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 (stronger) | 87 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 77th |
| Total assets | $7.0B | $417.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $6.0B | $347.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.43% | 16.97% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.51% (stronger) | 1.61% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.24% | 1.72% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.7% | 78.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.0% | 14.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 64 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 21.6% | 11.3% |
The Bank of Landisburg has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mid Penn Bank leads on 1 and The Bank of Landisburg on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.