Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. vs Lee Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. | Lee Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 50 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 83 |
| Earnings | 25 | 60 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 69 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 29th | 26th |
| Total assets | $654.4M | $591.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $576.5M | $519.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.97% (stronger) | 9.63% |
| Problem loans | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.52% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.14% | 0.99% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 91.4% | 84.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.0% (stronger) | 34.8% |
| Offices | 3 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 1.3% | 9.1% |
Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. has the higher TellerScore (65 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Middlesex Federal Savings, F.A. leads on 4 and Lee Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.