Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
MidFirst Bank vs Bank 7
Metric by metric
| Measure | MidFirst Bank | Bank 7 |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 34 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 40 | 89 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 87 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 78 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 40 | 54 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 0 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 3rd | 97th |
| Total assets | $42.8B | $1.9B |
| Deposits / shares | $25.3B | $1.6B |
| Capital ratio | 9.01% | 13.88% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 18.31% | 0.39% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.46% | 2.10% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 131.5% | 96.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.4% | 23.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 93 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 954 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 37.7 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 16.3% | 3.4% |
Bank 7 has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 34). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), MidFirst Bank leads on 0 and Bank 7 on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.