Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Midwest Bank vs Valley Premier Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Midwest Bank | Valley Premier Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 48 | 61 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 78 |
| Funding & liquidity | 37 | 82 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 80th |
| Total assets | $984.5M | $141.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $788.5M | $127.7M |
| Capital ratio | 9.84% | 11.13% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.05% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.52% (stronger) | 1.44% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 111.9% | 70.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.6% | 22.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Valley Premier Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Midwest Bank leads on 1 and Valley Premier Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.