Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Midwest Regional Bank vs Bank of Kampsville
Metric by metric
| Measure | Midwest Regional Bank | Bank of Kampsville |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 26 | 91 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 0 | 57 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 14 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 0th | 96th |
| Total assets | $949.0M | $134.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $840.1M | $110.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.23% | 17.41% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 6.61% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 3.03% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -1.34% | 0.93% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.9% | 42.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.8% | 7.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 27.6% |
Bank of Kampsville has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 26). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Midwest Regional Bank leads on 0 and Bank of Kampsville on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.