TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mile High Federal Credit Union vs Badlands Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mile High Federal Credit Union

Butte, Montana · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Badlands Federal Credit Union

Glendive, Montana · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureMile High Federal Credit UnionBadlands Federal Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)54
Capital cushion93 (stronger)31
Loan quality100 (stronger)52
Earnings45 (stronger)40
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)89
Peer percentile83rd13th
Total assets$30.2M$37.6M
Deposits / shares$25.6M$34.6M
Capital ratio14.27% (stronger)8.06%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.45%
Net charge-offs0.05% (stronger)0.21%
Return on assets0.62% (stronger)0.49%
Loans ÷ deposits38.4%32.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits1.1% (stronger)8.3%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Mile High Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mile High Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Badlands Federal Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions