TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union vs Superior Municipal Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union

Duluth, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

72of 100
Strong

Credit union

Superior Municipal Employees Credit Union

Superior, Wisconsin · Under $100 million in assets

79of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMinnesota Power Employees Credit UnionSuperior Municipal Employees Credit Union
TellerScore7279 (stronger)
Capital cushion97100 (stronger)
Loan quality36100 (stronger)
Earnings74 (stronger)26
Funding & liquidity75 (stronger)57
Problem-loan coverage81100 (stronger)
Peer percentile57th62nd
Total assets$161.9M$3.0M
Deposits / shares$135.9M$2.4M
Capital ratio14.66%16.50% (stronger)
Problem loans1.92%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04%-0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)0.15%
Loans ÷ deposits85.3% (stronger)102.8%
Uninsured deposits7.2%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Superior Municipal Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union leads on 2 and Superior Municipal Employees Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions