TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Minnesota Valley Federal Credit Union vs Greater Community Credit Union

Credit union

Minnesota Valley Federal Credit Union

Mankato, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

77of 100
Strong

Credit union

Greater Community Credit Union

Dawson, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

91of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMinnesota Valley Federal Credit UnionGreater Community Credit Union
TellerScore7791 (stronger)
Capital cushion65100 (stronger)
Loan quality8184 (stronger)
Earnings6386 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage9597 (stronger)
Peer percentile71st96th
Total assets$329.0M$296.5M
Deposits / shares$289.7M$235.0M
Capital ratio11.48%20.72% (stronger)
Problem loans0.56%0.48% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.11%-0.09% (stronger)
Return on assets1.06%1.66% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits58.1% (stronger)73.6%
Uninsured deposits4.6% (stronger)9.7%
Offices34
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)5.2%—

Greater Community Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Minnesota Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Greater Community Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions