TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs I B E W 26 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

I B E W 26 Federal Credit Union

Lanham, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

57of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Gilead Federal Credit UnionI B E W 26 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore93 (stronger)57
Capital cushion100 (stronger)26
Loan quality100 (stronger)75
Earnings66 (stronger)41
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)91
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)87
Peer percentile94th17th
Total assets$78K$29.9M
Deposits / shares$63K$27.0M
Capital ratio17.49% (stronger)7.58%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.75%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.43%
Return on assets1.14% (stronger)0.52%
Loans ÷ deposits35.0% (stronger)69.7%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and I B E W 26 Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions