TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Suitland, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Gilead Federal Credit UnionNone Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union
TellerScore9399 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)96
Earnings66100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile94th99th
Total assets$78K$27.9M
Deposits / shares$63K$22.3M
Capital ratio17.49%20.14% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.12%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets1.14%2.07% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits35.0%11.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.9%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 93). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions