Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mt. McKinley Bank vs Northrim Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mt. McKinley Bank | Northrim Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 69 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 61 | 70 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 48 | 99 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 96 (stronger) | 46 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 (stronger) | 88 |
| Peer percentile | 75th | 53rd |
| Total assets | $635.2M | $3.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $523.7M | $2.9B |
| Capital ratio | 18.85% (stronger) | 10.26% |
| Problem loans | 1.18% | 0.89% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.69% | 1.98% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 54.8% (stronger) | 87.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.0% (stronger) | 38.9% |
| Offices | 5 | 21 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Mt. McKinley Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt. McKinley Bank leads on 4 and Northrim Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.