Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mt. Zion Credit Union vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mt. Zion Credit Union | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 58 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 49th | 97th |
| Total assets | $428K | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $347K | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 18.91% (stronger) | 14.49% |
| Problem loans | 3.97% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | 3.93% (stronger) | 0.95% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 22.6% (stronger) | 62.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 74). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt. Zion Credit Union leads on 4 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.