TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union vs Elements Financial Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union

Indianapolis, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Elements Financial Federal Credit Union

Indianapolis, Indiana · $1 billion – $10 billion

77of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit UnionElements Financial Federal Credit Union
TellerScore98 (stronger)77
Capital cushion100 (stronger)69
Loan quality100 (stronger)85
Earnings89 (stronger)76
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)69
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)94
Peer percentile98th82nd
Total assets$1.4M$2.5B
Deposits / shares$733K$2.0B
Capital ratio38.27% (stronger)11.92%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.46%
Net charge-offs0.93%0.21% (stronger)
Return on assets1.73% (stronger)1.40%
Loans ÷ deposits54.3% (stronger)85.3%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)20.5%
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—15.7%

Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Elements Financial Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions