TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mutual Savings Credit Union vs Fort McClellan Credit Union

Credit union

Mutual Savings Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Fort McClellan Credit Union

Anniston, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureMutual Savings Credit UnionFort McClellan Credit Union
TellerScore6568 (stronger)
Capital cushion4177 (stronger)
Loan quality94 (stronger)61
Earnings30 (stronger)27
Funding & liquidity92100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)90
Peer percentile34th45th
Total assets$242.8M$224.1M
Deposits / shares$214.0M$201.7M
Capital ratio9.06%12.73% (stronger)
Problem loans0.19% (stronger)1.17%
Net charge-offs0.27% (stronger)0.70%
Return on assets0.26% (stronger)0.18%
Loans ÷ deposits68.2%48.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits12.3%3.0% (stronger)
Offices75
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)47.7%—

Fort McClellan Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mutual Savings Credit Union leads on 3 and Fort McClellan Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions