TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union vs Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Credit union

N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union

Warren, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Blasdell, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

96of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureN.F.G. #2 Federal Credit UnionGreater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8096 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality5796 (stronger)
Earnings5785 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile65th99th
Total assets$24.2M$168.4M
Deposits / shares$20.5M$127.8M
Capital ratio15.74%23.92% (stronger)
Problem loans1.28%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.93%0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets0.91%1.62% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits18.4% (stronger)55.9%
Uninsured deposits0.4%0.0% (stronger)
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—4.9%

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions