Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
NBT Bank, National Association vs Ed-Med Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | NBT Bank, National Association | Ed-Med Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 | 76 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 75 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 82 (stronger) | 64 |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 63 |
| Funding & liquidity | 44 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 94 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 46th | 54th |
| Total assets | $16.1B | $34.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $13.7B | $30.3M |
| Capital ratio | 9.49% | 12.51% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.55% (stronger) | 1.08% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.16% | -0.08% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.21% (stronger) | 1.07% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.8% | 42.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 42.5% | 1.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 174 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 127 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 9.3 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.4% | — |
Ed-Med Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), NBT Bank, National Association leads on 2 and Ed-Med Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.