Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Neiman Marcus Group Employees Federal Credit Union vs E M O T Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Neiman Marcus Group Employees Federal Credit Union
Dallas, Texas · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Neiman Marcus Group Employees Federal Credit Union | E M O T Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 78 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 89 (stronger) | 43 |
| Earnings | 0 | 62 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 59th |
| Total assets | $9.5M | $9.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $7.8M | $5.5M |
| Capital ratio | 15.93% | 39.67% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.34% (stronger) | 1.72% |
| Net charge-offs | 2.47% | 1.62% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -0.66% | 1.05% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 54.5% | 50.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
E M O T Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 77). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Neiman Marcus Group Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and E M O T Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.