TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

New Cumberland Federal Credit Union vs Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Credit union

New Cumberland Federal Credit Union

New Cumberland, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

90of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNew Cumberland Federal Credit UnionSusquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6690 (stronger)
Capital cushion4573 (stronger)
Loan quality7598 (stronger)
Earnings5394 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity96100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9199 (stronger)
Peer percentile37th89th
Total assets$228.6M$86.9M
Deposits / shares$206.5M$76.4M
Capital ratio9.48%12.29% (stronger)
Problem loans0.74%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.71%0.07% (stronger)
Return on assets0.84%1.84% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits63.8%58.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits5.8%1.7% (stronger)
Offices51
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)19.6%—

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New Cumberland Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions