TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union vs Greater Together Federal Credit Union

Credit union

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union

New York, New York · Under $100 million in assets

63of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Greater Together Federal Credit Union

Niagara Falls, New York · Under $100 million in assets

77of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNew York Times Employees Federal Credit UnionGreater Together Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6377 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)87
Loan quality045 (stronger)
Earnings4980 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage8290 (stronger)
Peer percentile26th57th
Total assets$73.6M$69.5M
Deposits / shares$61.4M$59.5M
Capital ratio17.16% (stronger)13.69%
Problem loans3.04%1.64% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.21%-0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets0.72%1.50% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.9% (stronger)50.1%
Uninsured deposits10.8%4.3% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greater Together Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Greater Together Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions