TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union vs Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Credit union

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union

New York, New York · Under $100 million in assets

63of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNew York Times Employees Federal Credit UnionWakefern Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6399 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality096 (stronger)
Earnings49100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage82100 (stronger)
Peer percentile26th99th
Total assets$73.6M$12.0M
Deposits / shares$61.4M$9.1M
Capital ratio17.16%24.31% (stronger)
Problem loans3.04%0.13% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.21%0.09% (stronger)
Return on assets0.72%2.03% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.9%42.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits10.8% (stronger)16.4%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Wakefern Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions