TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Northern Sts Pwr Company Emp Federal Credit Union vs Med Park Credit Union

Credit union

Northern Sts Pwr Company Emp Federal Credit Union

Grand Forks, North Dakota · Under $100 million in assets

77of 100
Strong

Credit union

Med Park Credit Union

Grand Forks, North Dakota · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNorthern Sts Pwr Company Emp Federal Credit UnionMed Park Credit Union
TellerScore7786 (stronger)
Capital cushion58100 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)99
Earnings59 (stronger)50
Funding & liquidity85 (stronger)75
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile57th80th
Total assets$1.5M$18.1M
Deposits / shares$1.3M$14.9M
Capital ratio10.83%16.53% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.04%
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets0.98% (stronger)0.75%
Loans ÷ deposits75.5% (stronger)84.9%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)3.1%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Med Park Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Northern Sts Pwr Company Emp Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Med Park Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions