Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Norway Savings Bank vs Auburn Savings Bank, FSB
Metric by metric
| Measure | Norway Savings Bank | Auburn Savings Bank, FSB |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 91 (stronger) | 30 |
| Loan quality | 90 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 71 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 51 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 13th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $103.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.6B | $75.9M |
| Capital ratio | 14.07% (stronger) | 8.03% |
| Problem loans | 0.29% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.28% (stronger) | 0.18% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 103.1% (stronger) | 111.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.5% | 17.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 25 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 18.8% | 11.4% |
Norway Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Norway Savings Bank leads on 4 and Auburn Savings Bank, FSB on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.