Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Old National Bank vs Grand Timber Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Old National Bank | Grand Timber Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 59 (stronger) | 48 |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 57 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 (stronger) | 6 |
| Earnings | 76 (stronger) | 70 |
| Funding & liquidity | 41 | 58 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 (stronger) | 62 |
| Peer percentile | 25th | 8th |
| Total assets | $73.9B | $64.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $57.0B | $53.9M |
| Capital ratio | 8.80% | 10.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.92% (stronger) | 2.81% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.26% (stronger) | 0.75% |
| Return on assets | 1.41% (stronger) | 1.26% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.2% (stronger) | 102.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 43.3% | 10.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 342 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 269 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.7 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 22.1% | — |
Old National Bank has the higher TellerScore (59 vs 48). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Old National Bank leads on 5 and Grand Timber Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.