Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Old National Bank vs KodaBank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Old National Bank | KodaBank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 59 | 75 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 53 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 | 90 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 | 87 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 41 | 63 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 25th | 61st |
| Total assets | $73.9B | $559.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $57.0B | $483.0M |
| Capital ratio | 8.80% | 10.28% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.92% | 0.30% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.26% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.41% | 1.69% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.2% (stronger) | 88.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 43.3% | 23.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 342 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 269 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.7 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 22.1% | 0.0% |
KodaBank has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Old National Bank leads on 1 and KodaBank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.