TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Operating Engineers Local Union #3 Federal Credit Union vs Mt. Rainier Credit Union

Credit union

Operating Engineers Local Union #3 Federal Credit Union

Livermore, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

92of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Mt. Rainier Credit Union

Puyallup, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureOperating Engineers Local Union #3 Federal Credit UnionMt. Rainier Credit Union
TellerScore92 (stronger)74
Capital cushion100 (stronger)84
Loan quality80 (stronger)76
Earnings91 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity93100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9697 (stronger)
Peer percentile98th49th
Total assets$1.7B$26.3M
Deposits / shares$1.4B$22.8M
Capital ratio15.48% (stronger)13.36%
Problem loans0.60% (stronger)0.72%
Net charge-offs0.33%0.12% (stronger)
Return on assets1.78% (stronger)0.11%
Loans ÷ deposits60.3%31.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits20.7%4.2% (stronger)
Offices241
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Operating Engineers Local Union #3 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Operating Engineers Local Union #3 Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Mt. Rainier Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions