TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Paac Transit Division Federal Credit Union vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Paac Transit Division Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

76of 100
Strong

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePaac Transit Division Federal Credit UnionI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7698 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality3298 (stronger)
Earnings6591 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage95100 (stronger)
Peer percentile54th98th
Total assets$29.2M$15.4M
Deposits / shares$24.0M$13.0M
Capital ratio17.60% (stronger)15.39%
Problem loans2.04%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.71%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets1.12%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits25.7% (stronger)61.6%
Uninsured deposits1.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Paac Transit Division Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions