Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Park State Bank vs Woodland Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Park State Bank | Woodland Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 (stronger) | 52 |
| Capital cushion | 49 (stronger) | 36 |
| Loan quality | 69 (stronger) | 49 |
| Earnings | 72 (stronger) | 60 |
| Funding & liquidity | 73 (stronger) | 62 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 (stronger) | 74 |
| Peer percentile | 40th | 8th |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $177.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $152.0M |
| Capital ratio | 9.89% (stronger) | 8.62% |
| Problem loans | 0.92% (stronger) | 1.53% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.55% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.30% (stronger) | 1.01% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 74.1% (stronger) | 89.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.5% | 23.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 14 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.5% | — |
Park State Bank has the higher TellerScore (66 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Park State Bank leads on 5 and Woodland Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.