TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

People'S Alliance Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

People'S Alliance Federal Credit Union

Hauppauge, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePeople'S Alliance Federal Credit UnionLatvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6788 (stronger)
Capital cushion61100 (stronger)
Loan quality81100 (stronger)
Earnings3842 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity80100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage93100 (stronger)
Peer percentile41st85th
Total assets$322.2M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$282.5M$1.4M
Capital ratio11.13%25.25% (stronger)
Problem loans0.58%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.66%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.45%0.55% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits79.9%20.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices81
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)56.7%—

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), People'S Alliance Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions